TY - JOUR
T1 - Liver tumour segmentation using contrast-enhanced multi-detector CT data
T2 - Performance benchmarking of three semiautomated methods
AU - Zhou, Jia Yin
AU - Wong, Damon W.K.
AU - Ding, Feng
AU - Venkatesh, Sudhakar K.
AU - Tian, Qi
AU - Qi, Ying Yi
AU - Xiong, Wei
AU - Liu, Jimmy J.
AU - Leow, Wee Kheng
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is supported by a research grant (SBIC RP C-008/2006) from the Singapore Bio-Imaging Consortium, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore. The authors would like to thank Prof Shih-chang Wang (Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Australia) and Dr Thazin Han (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore) for their support and help. We also would like to thank Dr Xiang Deng and Dr Guangwei Du (Centre for Medical Imaging Validation, Siemens Corporate Technology, China) for their great effort in organising the LTSC and maintaining the competition website.
PY - 2010/7
Y1 - 2010/7
N2 - Objective: Automatic tumour segmentation and volumetry is useful in cancer staging and treatment outcome assessment. This paper presents a performance benchmarking study on liver tumour segmentation for three semiautomatic algorithms: 2D region growing with knowledge-based constraints (A1), 2D voxel classification with propagational learning (A2) and Bayesian rule-based 3D region growing (A3). Methods: CT data from 30 patients were studied, and 47 liver tumours were isolated and manually segmented by experts to obtain the reference standard. Four datasets with ten tumours were used for algorithm training and the remaining 37 tumours for testing. Three evaluation metrics, relative absolute volume difference (RAVD), volumetric overlap error (VOE) and average symmetric surface distance (ASSD), were computed based on computerised and reference segmentations. Results: A1, A2 and A3 obtained mean/median RAVD scores of 17.93/10.53%, 17.92/9.61% and 34.74/28.75%, mean/median VOEs of 30.47/26.79%, 25.70/22.64% and 39.95/38.54%, and mean/median ASSDs of 2.05/1.41 mm, 1.57/1.15 mm and 4.12/3.41 mm, respectively. For each metric, we obtained significantly lower values of A1 and A2 than A3 (P<0.01), suggesting that A1 and A2 outperformed A3. Conclusions: Compared with the reference standard, the overall performance of A1 and A2 is promising. Further development and validation is necessary before reliable tumour segmentation and volumetry can be widely used clinically.
AB - Objective: Automatic tumour segmentation and volumetry is useful in cancer staging and treatment outcome assessment. This paper presents a performance benchmarking study on liver tumour segmentation for three semiautomatic algorithms: 2D region growing with knowledge-based constraints (A1), 2D voxel classification with propagational learning (A2) and Bayesian rule-based 3D region growing (A3). Methods: CT data from 30 patients were studied, and 47 liver tumours were isolated and manually segmented by experts to obtain the reference standard. Four datasets with ten tumours were used for algorithm training and the remaining 37 tumours for testing. Three evaluation metrics, relative absolute volume difference (RAVD), volumetric overlap error (VOE) and average symmetric surface distance (ASSD), were computed based on computerised and reference segmentations. Results: A1, A2 and A3 obtained mean/median RAVD scores of 17.93/10.53%, 17.92/9.61% and 34.74/28.75%, mean/median VOEs of 30.47/26.79%, 25.70/22.64% and 39.95/38.54%, and mean/median ASSDs of 2.05/1.41 mm, 1.57/1.15 mm and 4.12/3.41 mm, respectively. For each metric, we obtained significantly lower values of A1 and A2 than A3 (P<0.01), suggesting that A1 and A2 outperformed A3. Conclusions: Compared with the reference standard, the overall performance of A1 and A2 is promising. Further development and validation is necessary before reliable tumour segmentation and volumetry can be widely used clinically.
KW - Computed tomography (CT)
KW - Image segmentation
KW - Liver tumour
KW - Performance benchmarking
KW - Tumour volumetry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954819248&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00330-010-1712-z
DO - 10.1007/s00330-010-1712-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 20157817
AN - SCOPUS:77954819248
SN - 0938-7994
VL - 20
SP - 1738
EP - 1748
JO - European Radiology
JF - European Radiology
IS - 7
ER -