Comparative Analysis of Renewable Energy incentive policies strategic: Case Studies and Policy Recommendations for China Sustainable Development

Chuyi Luo; Liang Xia

doi:10.46855/energy-proceedings-10804

Comparative Analysis of Renewable Energy incentive policies strategic: Case Studies and Policy Recommendations for China Sustainable Development

Chuyi Luo, Liang Xia

Department of Architecture and Built Environment

Research output: Journal Publication › Conference article › peer-review

Abstract

This research paper presents the review of two renewable energy strategies, Feed In Tariff (FIT) and Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS), in China and other countries. The two FIT schemes, which are Erneuerbare Energien Gesetz (EEG) in Germany and Benchmark Grid Electricity Prices (BGEP) in China, are compared. On the other hand, three RPS schemes, which are California's RPS Program, Australia's Renewable Energy Target (RET), and China's Weighting of Responsibility for Renewable Energy Electricity Consumption (WRREEC) framework are reviewed and discussed. Based on the review and findings, recommendations on the future development of renewable energy strategies in China are presented.

Original language	English
Journal	Energy Proceedings
Volume	36
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.46855/energy-proceedings-10804
Publication status	Published - 2023
Event	9th Applied Energy Symposium: Low Carbon Cities and Urban Energy Systems, CUE 2023 - Tokyo, Japan Duration: 2 Sept 2023 → 7 Sept 2023

Keywords

Carbon neutrality
Carbon peak
China
Feed In Tariffs
Renewable Portfolio Standards

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Fuel Technology
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Energy (miscellaneous)

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.46855/energy-proceedings-10804

Cite this

@article{a2732c4cc7c544cc89b54bf8f03d3858,

title = "Comparative Analysis of Renewable Energy incentive policies strategic: Case Studies and Policy Recommendations for China Sustainable Development",

abstract = "This research paper presents the review of two renewable energy strategies, Feed In Tariff (FIT) and Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS), in China and other countries. The two FIT schemes, which are Erneuerbare Energien Gesetz (EEG) in Germany and Benchmark Grid Electricity Prices (BGEP) in China, are compared. On the other hand, three RPS schemes, which are California's RPS Program, Australia's Renewable Energy Target (RET), and China's Weighting of Responsibility for Renewable Energy Electricity Consumption (WRREEC) framework are reviewed and discussed. Based on the review and findings, recommendations on the future development of renewable energy strategies in China are presented.",

keywords = "Carbon neutrality, Carbon peak, China, Feed In Tariffs, Renewable Portfolio Standards",

author = "Chuyi Luo and Liang Xia",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024, Scanditale AB. All rights reserved.; 9th Applied Energy Symposium: Low Carbon Cities and Urban Energy Systems, CUE 2023 ; Conference date: 02-09-2023 Through 07-09-2023",

year = "2023",

doi = "10.46855/energy-proceedings-10804",

language = "English",

volume = "36",

journal = "Energy Proceedings",

issn = "2004-2965",

publisher = "Scanditale AB",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative Analysis of Renewable Energy incentive policies strategic

T2 - 9th Applied Energy Symposium: Low Carbon Cities and Urban Energy Systems, CUE 2023

AU - Luo, Chuyi

AU - Xia, Liang

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - This research paper presents the review of two renewable energy strategies, Feed In Tariff (FIT) and Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS), in China and other countries. The two FIT schemes, which are Erneuerbare Energien Gesetz (EEG) in Germany and Benchmark Grid Electricity Prices (BGEP) in China, are compared. On the other hand, three RPS schemes, which are California's RPS Program, Australia's Renewable Energy Target (RET), and China's Weighting of Responsibility for Renewable Energy Electricity Consumption (WRREEC) framework are reviewed and discussed. Based on the review and findings, recommendations on the future development of renewable energy strategies in China are presented.

AB - This research paper presents the review of two renewable energy strategies, Feed In Tariff (FIT) and Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS), in China and other countries. The two FIT schemes, which are Erneuerbare Energien Gesetz (EEG) in Germany and Benchmark Grid Electricity Prices (BGEP) in China, are compared. On the other hand, three RPS schemes, which are California's RPS Program, Australia's Renewable Energy Target (RET), and China's Weighting of Responsibility for Renewable Energy Electricity Consumption (WRREEC) framework are reviewed and discussed. Based on the review and findings, recommendations on the future development of renewable energy strategies in China are presented.

KW - Carbon neutrality

KW - Carbon peak

KW - China

KW - Feed In Tariffs

KW - Renewable Portfolio Standards

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190675102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.46855/energy-proceedings-10804

DO - 10.46855/energy-proceedings-10804

M3 - Conference article

AN - SCOPUS:85190675102

SN - 2004-2965

VL - 36

JO - Energy Proceedings

JF - Energy Proceedings

Y2 - 2 September 2023 through 7 September 2023

ER -

Comparative Analysis of Renewable Energy incentive policies strategic: Case Studies and Policy Recommendations for China Sustainable Development

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this