TY - GEN
T1 - Crosstalk current measurements using multi-electrode arrays in saline
AU - Tran, N.
AU - Halpern, M.
AU - Bai, S.
AU - Skafidas, E.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - This paper investigates how the configuration of return electrodes in an electrode array affects the amount of current crosstalk when electrodes are driven simultaneously in saline. Two pairs of electrodes in different return configurations were stimulated with different-amplitude biphasic currents. Stimulating electrodes were controlled by current sinks and current sources while return electrodes were connected to supply voltage or ground. Measurement results show that no matter what return configuration was used, the return current was almost equally distributed amongst the return electrodes, which is problematic in bipolar concurrent stimulation, at least in saline. This result is due to the fact that the spreading impedance of saline solution is small compared to the electrode-electrolyte impedance, which makes the saline solution have almost the same potential. This result suggests that monopolar stimulation using a common remote return electrode be used in simultaneous stimulation to avoid crosstalk.
AB - This paper investigates how the configuration of return electrodes in an electrode array affects the amount of current crosstalk when electrodes are driven simultaneously in saline. Two pairs of electrodes in different return configurations were stimulated with different-amplitude biphasic currents. Stimulating electrodes were controlled by current sinks and current sources while return electrodes were connected to supply voltage or ground. Measurement results show that no matter what return configuration was used, the return current was almost equally distributed amongst the return electrodes, which is problematic in bipolar concurrent stimulation, at least in saline. This result is due to the fact that the spreading impedance of saline solution is small compared to the electrode-electrolyte impedance, which makes the saline solution have almost the same potential. This result suggests that monopolar stimulation using a common remote return electrode be used in simultaneous stimulation to avoid crosstalk.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882998105&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346600
DO - 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346600
M3 - Conference contribution
C2 - 23366561
AN - SCOPUS:84882998105
SN - 9781424441198
T3 - Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS
SP - 3021
EP - 3024
BT - 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2012
T2 - 34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS 2012
Y2 - 28 August 2012 through 1 September 2012
ER -