Red lines of journalism: digital surveillance, safety risks and journalists' self-censorship in Pakistan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedingBook Chapterpeer-review

Abstract

Drawing on Reese’s hierarchy of influences model, this study investigates the extent to which safety risks and digital surveillance result in journalists’ self-censorship in Pakistan. This study also explores the key areas of journalists’ self-censorship in the country and how it affects their right to freedom of expression. To achieve these objectives, the study uses the quantitative method of survey and the qualitative method of in-depth interviews. The study uses relative frequency statistics and thematic analysis to analyse the survey and interview data respectively. This study reveals that journalists’ self-censorship is related to diverse safety risks (especially physical, financial, legal, topic-specific and public risks) and to digital surveillance by the government, military and its intelligence agencies. This study also highlights that most of the Pakistani journalists are not trained for digitally safe and encrypted communication, which indicates a pressing need for journalists’ education in order to avoid any foreseeable digital and other types of risks.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationJournalist safety and self-censorship
EditorsAnna Grøndahl Larsen, Ingrid Fadnes, Roy Krøvel
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter3
Pages29-46
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9780367810139
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Red lines of journalism: digital surveillance, safety risks and journalists' self-censorship in Pakistan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this