TY - JOUR
T1 - The origins of capitalism in Turkey
T2 - the transition debate revisited
AU - Duzgun, Eren
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The transition to capitalism has been one of the most perennial questions in the field of historical sociology. A distinct brand of historical materialism known as Political Marxism (PM) has offered critical insights into the “transition debate,” which have yet to be systematically applied to the case of Turkey. Utilizing a theoretical framework informed by PM, this article problematizes the conventional narratives of the “transition” in the Ottoman Empire and Turkey (1850–1950). It contends that no capitalism developed in Turkey until the 1950s; that is, the conditions conventionally thought to be indicators of capitalist development—such as property rights, wage labor, and accumulation of industrial and mercantile wealth—did not result in a (peripheral) capitalism in Turkey as usually assumed. By revisiting the “transition debate,” therefore, this article seeks to re-periodize the development of capitalism in Turkey, which in turn prompts a fundamental rethinking of both the past and present of Turkish modernity.
AB - The transition to capitalism has been one of the most perennial questions in the field of historical sociology. A distinct brand of historical materialism known as Political Marxism (PM) has offered critical insights into the “transition debate,” which have yet to be systematically applied to the case of Turkey. Utilizing a theoretical framework informed by PM, this article problematizes the conventional narratives of the “transition” in the Ottoman Empire and Turkey (1850–1950). It contends that no capitalism developed in Turkey until the 1950s; that is, the conditions conventionally thought to be indicators of capitalist development—such as property rights, wage labor, and accumulation of industrial and mercantile wealth—did not result in a (peripheral) capitalism in Turkey as usually assumed. By revisiting the “transition debate,” therefore, this article seeks to re-periodize the development of capitalism in Turkey, which in turn prompts a fundamental rethinking of both the past and present of Turkish modernity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85204282531&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10624-024-09739-7
DO - 10.1007/s10624-024-09739-7
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85204282531
SN - 0304-4092
JO - Dialectical Anthropology
JF - Dialectical Anthropology
ER -